<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sensor on Tahir Hashmi</title><link>https://tahirhashmi.com/tags/sensor/</link><description>Recent content in Sensor on Tahir Hashmi</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><managingEditor>mail@tahirhashmi.com (Tahir Hashmi)</managingEditor><webMaster>mail@tahirhashmi.com (Tahir Hashmi)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 11:13:16 +0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://tahirhashmi.com/tags/sensor/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Factoring the Crop</title><link>https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2016/08/21/factoring-the-crop/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2016 04:57:18 +0000</pubDate><author>mail@tahirhashmi.com (Tahir Hashmi)</author><guid>https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2016/08/21/factoring-the-crop/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/code_martial/28834996980/"
 title="Factoring the Crop (See Description)"
 target="_blank" rel="noopener"
&gt;








 &lt;figure&gt;
 
 &lt;img $destination src="https://c5.staticflickr.com/9/8250/28834996980_9d8000875b_b.jpg" alt="Factoring the Crop (See Description)" style="aspect-ratio: 1.499267935578331; width: 100%; max-width:1024px;"&gt;
 
 
 &lt;/figure&gt;
 

&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s a picture whose EXIF I have stripped so you won’t know what equipment was used to shoot it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you had to guess the sensor size, considering that this is a minimally edited photo, what would be your guess? FX? DX? m43? 1″? 1/1.7″? 1/2.3″?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Small sensor systems are all the rage these days. 24-1200mm zoom in a handy little package. How about that? The problem is, tiny sensors come with compromises. You have to bear with the compromises in &lt;a href="https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2013/11/08/sensor-format-blind-test-results"


&gt;every situation&lt;/a&gt;. How would it be, if you could deal with the compromises only when you needed to?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sensor Format Blind Test Results</title><link>https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2013/11/08/sensor-format-blind-test-results/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:57:06 +0000</pubDate><author>mail@tahirhashmi.com (Tahir Hashmi)</author><guid>https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2013/11/08/sensor-format-blind-test-results/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The results of the &lt;a href="https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2013/10/31/sensor-format-blind-test"


&gt;Sensor Format Blind Test&lt;/a&gt; are out!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I got a total of 13 responses, which is a bit too low for a full-blown, conclusive ranking analysis. We can, however, do some meaningful analysis if we ask simpler questions. To start with,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Is the photo from &lt;em&gt;Format X&lt;/em&gt; the best?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To answer this question, we simply count the number of respondents who placed the photo from the given format as the best. Here are the results:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sensor Format Blind Test</title><link>https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2013/10/31/sensor-format-blind-test/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:41:11 +0000</pubDate><author>mail@tahirhashmi.com (Tahir Hashmi)</author><guid>https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2013/10/31/sensor-format-blind-test/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="tldr"&gt;TL;DR&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rank the four shots below from best to worst. Mention the position as &lt;em&gt;top-right&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;bottom-left&lt;/em&gt;, etc. Submit your ranking as a comment.








 &lt;figure&gt;
 
 &lt;img $destination src="https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7426/10588931844_6cbb1c8b66_o.png" alt="Sensor Format Blind Test" style="aspect-ratio: 0.9450726978998385; width: 100%; max-width:585px;"&gt;
 
 &lt;figcaption&gt;Rank the above images from best to worst. Mention positions as top-right, bottom-left, etc.&lt;/figcaption&gt;
 &lt;/figure&gt;
 

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-fuss"&gt;The Fuss&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are interesting times for camera enthusiasts. Digital cameras have advanced to a level where most cameras are capable of  publication quality snaps and you don’t even need to carry a camera to take good pictures, thanks to smartphones.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Impact of Sensor Size on Performance — a Contemporary Survey</title><link>https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2013/02/09/sensor-size-vs-performance/</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 12:41:10 +0000</pubDate><author>mail@tahirhashmi.com (Tahir Hashmi)</author><guid>https://tahirhashmi.com/posts/2013/02/09/sensor-size-vs-performance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am in the middle of a choice between interchangeable lens systems and one of my pressing needs is the selection of a system that lets me have a smaller, lighter camera bag. Now is not a bad time to be shopping for cameras, with so much choice being available across price brackets and IQ variance. As always, having a lot to choose from is another way of getting confused, so I decided to do some objective data analysis to figure out what’s what.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>